I have used steenbecks to create film prints/workprints, from both 16mm and 
35mm negatives. I have also used it to create a 16mm film prints that have 
optical tracks. 
Have fun with it!

Roger D. Wilson613 324 - [email protected]http://www.rogerdwilson.ca
Without failure you can never achieve success. I have based my process and my 
career as an experimental film artist on this statement; and I welcome it as it 
pushes me forward as an artist to try something different, something new. 

> From: [email protected]
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:55:33 +0200
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Frameworks] New Uses for Steenbeck 901 Editing Table?
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> A local production company was giving away a 16mm Steenbeck editing table for 
> the cost of its removal so naturally I enlisted the help of three strong men 
> and brought it home and now it occupies a prominent place in my living room, 
> since it is impossible to get up the stairs or fit into any other room.  
> After testing the unit it works fine and having only used hand-cranked reels 
> up to now this seems like pure joy. 
> 
> However, I wanted to know if anyone can shed light on any of these issues in 
> order to make the machine practical for my personal use: 
> 
> Has anyone turned one of these into a telecine unit (D.I.Y. or Steenbeck 
> factory)?  Approximate costs involved?
> 
> Has anyone made theirs S16 (viewing) compatible?  Approximate costs involved?
> 
> Any way to view neg. film stock as positive on the screen?
> 
> Any other new ways to put these machines to good use?
>  
> 
> Appreciate your input!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
                                          
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to