Three years ago I had a 16mm frame scanned on a Scanmate machine, which is a drum scanner for photography. The depth and resolution was unbelievable. I had a 4ft wide print made of it, the picture held together. I can upload a sector if you are interested. Best, Marco
On 26 November 2013 19:20, Jeff Kreines <[email protected]> wrote: > The Duplikin and Testrite devices are junk. I used a Duplikin a lot, and it > was quite terrible. > > You will get better results using a DSLR or SLR with a good macro lens (or > extension tubes, or bellows) over a light box. > > Doing a high quality digital scan will give the best results, of course, but > it will be more expensive and overkill for a still frame or two. > > > On Nov 26, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Scott Dorsey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In addition to the Duplikin there was also the Testrite Cinelarger that >> was intended for single-frame blowups of movies. >> >> You could really use any slide duplicator, though. >> >> However.... you will not be pleased at blowups from 16mm originals let >> alone 8mm originals. It's always good to shoot some publicity stills >> while shooting the film. >> --scott >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > Jeff Kreines > Kinetta > [email protected] > kinetta.com > kinettaarchival.com > > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks -- “A brave flat world.” marco poloni usedomer strasse 8 d – 13355 berlin gsm de +49.163.6294080 gsm ch +41.78.6322028 skype marcopoloni _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
