> List: FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> From: rober...@earthlink.net
> Subject: 1. Rephotographing 16mm (Morgan Hoyle-Combs)
> Reason: Post by non-member to a members-only list
>
>
>
> Morgan,
> Do you wish to stay in film process and avoid digital processing, through
> which these things are easily handled?
> You don't need to do optical printing--make a contact print made with
> appropriate light settings ("timing") and choice of stock. Work with your lab
> on this. Of course the contact print will be flipped left to right, and
> emulsion side (it will be A wind not B wind).
>
> Best wishes,
> Robert Withers
> New York City
> withe...@earthlink.net
>
> Re:
> 1. Rephotographing 16mm (Morgan Hoyle-Combs)
> From: Morgan Hoyle-Combs <mhoyleco...@yahoo.com>
> Subject: [Frameworks] Rephotographing 16mm
> Date: July 12, 2016 6:26:48 AM EDT
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> Not sure if my first message got through, but here it goes again:
>
> One of my 16mm films came out a little too dense. It was a Double X roll
> processed as a reversal but the end result was rather dark. There's still
> images but they need to be blown out. Is there a way to rephotograph the roll
> to give it more contrast? Could this be done via optical printer?
>
> Let me know whatever helps!
>
> -Morgan
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
