An option, if your scans look good, would be to do a B&W film out to 16mm at Colorlab. They have a 5K film recorder for 16mm and 35mm You can’t deal with severely underexposed shots in contact printing, but can digitally.
> On Oct 19, 2016, at 3:24 PM, mariah garnett <mariah.garn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi guys, > I'm finishing a b+w 16mm film right now for Eve Fowler and some of the shots > in the answer print look like crapola and there's no way to get them to look > better (super under exposed, low contrast, just don't match the rest of the > film). Since we got our neg transferred to HD, we didn't realize how shitty > those shots were gonna look - they looked great on video. > > doug, our timer at the lab suggested we pull new shots, assemble them into > an A roll, bring that back to fotokem, have them time our new roll so as not > to have to charge for a whole new answer print, then once that's done, drop > them back into the A/B rolls and make a release print with the new shots/new > lights. > > Is there anyone in LA who can do this for us? We are in a time crunch and I > don't have rewinds or an A/B roller or anything like that. > > It's for a show that opens Nov 6th, so we need the print finished by the 1st. > Eek! > can anyone out there help us? > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks Jeff Kreines Kinetta j...@kinetta.com kinetta.com _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
