Thanks Scott, really helpful, I will be using rewind/bucket. Got some on order now!
Rob > On 7 Mar 2019, at 19:52, Scott Dorsey <klu...@panix.com> wrote: > > I have not but I have used other monobaths before. They are convenient, > but allow no control over gamma or really any part of the characteristic > curve. Most of them are inherently very compensating because the development > is limited by the fixation. If you like that look, good. Otherwise not so > good. > > The Air Force was very big on monobath processing for aerial film back in > Vietnam, because temperature and time were not very critical and for people > developing film in tents in the middle of a grassy field it reduced the > handling considerably and got film out to analysts faster. Most of the > monobath technology we have today came out of the space program and the Air > Force. > > If you're in an environment where you can't get even processing, and I can > see a lot of folks hand-processing motion picture film by rewind or in > a bucket having that problem, the monobath could be a big help. On the > other hand, so could a divided developer like Diafine. > --scott > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
