|
here's a review of the new Mike Nichols film, "Closer," which will appear soon on National Review Online. I don't usually send out pieces this close together, but I think I'll be sending out another one later today or tomorrow (on the "gay" shark in "Shark Tale"). Maybe will have a review of "House of Flying Daggers" on Monday.
Good news, we've set up a level of security for these mailings so the list can't be spammed any more. So sorry to all of you who had to endure that twice in recent months.
I guess the commentary did not air on NPR today because I haven't gotten the usual flood of mail from listeners. I asked my editor when it will air, but its hard for her to predict. These commentaries have a flexible shelf life, while the hard news has to get out on a timely basis. when they're putting the show together, the producer looks at all the commentaries they have waiting, and picks out the one that is exactly 3 minutes and 45 seconds long, because that's the hole they have in the news audio. My commentary may have to wait till its the right shape; its a little longer than most. After it airs it will be permanently available on the NPR website, so you don't have to worry too much abt missing it.
***
Closer This is about the saddest movie I've ever seen. Everyone in the movie is sad, everybody cries, everybody (at one time or another) looks like they were knocked down by a garbage truck and dragged down an alley. This is also a movie that has a lot of sex-talk in it; not much action, but about as much explicit description of sexual activity that a script can contain. There might be a connection. The title "Closer" is intended to mean intimacy, I think, as in "Come closer." But it might also mean the closing events that happen in relationships; lovers run into a moment that is a "closer" and they can't go any further. There are four individuals who inaugurate and end relationships in "Closer," changing partners and then coming back again. One of the carry-overs from the successful stage play (by Patrick Marber, who adapted it for the screen) is that it feels like these four are the only people in the movie, which makes it a bit claustrophobic. It's also extremely talky, a typical characteristic of plays as compared to film. Not a lot of car chases on stage. In "Closer" the writing is so complex and laden with symbolic intersections that it is nearly immobilized. There's a struggle between actors doing their best to convey real human beings, and over-constructed elegant text ("Have you ever seen a human heart?!? It looks like a fist wrapped in blood!"), and things pretty much come to a standstill. The first of several portentous themes appear in the opening scene, when Alice (Natalie Portman) and Dan (Jude Law), strangers approaching each other on a If you hold onto your ticket stub, and make a notch every time there's a reference to "strangers," you can keep track. Dan takes her to a clinic to get patched up and they begin a relationship, and when we jump forward a year we find he's written a novel based on her salacious previous life as a stripper. Dan goes to have an author photo taken and is seriously, if inexplicably, smitten by a new stranger: photographer Anna Cameron (Julia Roberts). She is working on an exhibition of photos that she's taken of random people in the street, which will be titled "Strangers." That night, Dan logs into a site called London SexAnon, which enables strangers to have instant-message sex. He initiates an encounter, bizarrely pretending to be Anna. (This scene has stumped many viewers and reviewers; why would the thoroughly hetero Dan pretend to be a woman in a sexual exchange? Yet he's just written a novel based on imagining a woman's sexual adventures. As Dan sits there typing, fully clothed in the afternoon, he doesn't look at all aroused. He looks like a novelist doing research.) The stranger duped into thinking he's chatting with a woman is Larry (Clive Owen). Pretend-Anna offers to meet Larry the next day at the aquarium. The next day Larry shows up and meets a stranger, the real Anna, there; after some initial bumbles, they hook up too. OK, now start the other side of the ticket stub, and keep track of fish. Anna tells Dan his novel should be titled "The Aquarium." She meets Larry at an aquarium. Or you could monitor the "Skin" theme: If you had two more sides to the ticket, you could dedicate them to "Truth/Lies" and "Happiness/Sadness." When it's thoroughly frayed, it will look like the poor travelers in this weeper, who verbalize their physical doings in the ugliest terms they can find, in ways designed to convey, and inflict pain. Wasn't there a time this was caused "making love"? Very little love is made in this movie, and that seems to be the point. Lost people keep trying to connect with each other's plumbing, and are bewildered when they remain empty and alone. Director Mike Nichols made another very sad movie about the intersection of sex and love, "Carnal Knowledge," in 1971. This one falls short in comparison because there seems to be so much less to say. That was a time of exploration of new territory; now people are used to going in circles. The main problem with this film is that, despite the interweaving stories of hookups and breakups, no one seems to be changed by experience. Not only do they learn nothing, they don't seem to be reasonably scarred. In "Closer" the four lovers go through wrenching experiences and then start over with a new, or the same, lover as if the game had been re-set to "Start." Compare that with the accurate way the brutalizing effects of loving and losing were depicted in "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind." So does it mean "Closer" as in intimacy, or "Closer" as in endings? I think you'll understand these characters best if you just drop the "C" entirely. ********
Frederica Mathewes-Green www.frederica.com |
_______________________________________________ Frederica-l mailing list *** Please address all replies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** You can check your subscription information here: http://lists.ctcnet.net/mailman/listinfo/frederica-l
