On 23-Mar-2000 Jimen Ching wrote:
> Because on systems where union semun is defined, you are still asking the
> compiler to do auto-conversion of one union type to another union type,
> which is illegal in C++. Thus, it fails to build on Debian 2.1 (egcs
> 1.1.2). Does it work better with 2.95.2?
Not on 2.95.2, looks like on newer versions of glibc. The definition of
semctl's changed a bit, probably just for this reason =)
I've checked junk into cvs that should work, let me know if it still doesn't.
Isaac
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.freeamp.org/mailman/listinfo/freeamp-dev
