https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207831
--- Comment #13 from Alexander V. Chernikov <melif...@freebsd.org> --- I'm sorry for disappearing for several month w/o handling this issue. Also, many thanks for Guy Yur for analysing the problem - indeed, all interface/loopback routes are installed w link-level sockaddr_dl "gateway" (used solely to save ifnet index of the target interface) and w/o RTF_GATEWAY flag. I totally forgot this case when making this change. The problem here is that sockaddr_dl is a pretty big structure (64 bytes vs 32-byte sockaddr_in6) so most of the users (which actually don't care about these "gateway" would still need to allocate this buffer in order to avoid receiving ENOMEM). Will think about it a bit and come w/ fix tomorrow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
