The following reply was made to PR bin/155034; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Chris Rees <[email protected]> To: [email protected], [email protected] Cc: Subject: Re: bin/155034: [PATCH] dd(1) dies on SIGUSR1; should print info Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:42:49 +0100
n 6 June 2011 19:20, <[email protected]> wrote: > Synopsis: [PATCH] dd(1) dies on SIGUSR1; should print info > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: jh > State-Changed-When: Mon Jun 6 18:04:17 UTC 2011 > State-Changed-Why: > Not a bug. As far as I can see ignoring the signal would violate POSIX: > > "For SIGINT, the dd utility shall interrupt its current processing, > write status information to standard error, and exit as though > terminated by SIGINT. It shall take the standard action for all other > signals; - -" > Clear and unambiguous wording, thank you very much for sorting this! Chris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
