https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211028
--- Comment #10 from Andrey V. Elsukov <a...@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Edward Tomasz Napierala from comment #9) > Hm. Okay. The read dd works, because the da(4) driver gets notified about > the capacity change on the first read command sent to the disk; basically > the disk responds with Unit Attention indicating this. The write dd works, > because it forces GEOM retaste. So it still fits the theory that GEOM > itself is fine, and it's just g_part(4) not handling it properly. As I said, tracing via dtrace or geom's internal capability should show that g_part receives resize event. In previous messages I didn't see this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
