On Tue, 4 Oct 2005 04:48:22 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 23:02:36 +0200 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) wrote: > > > Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Aaron Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Any recomendations on good spam filters? > > > Dspam [is] more accurate that spam assassin,with less resources > > > and less work for the admin > > > > Dspam is designed to work as a local delivery agent; all email > > addresses must map to a local user, and it delivers mail to an mbox > > file (though there are patches to make it work with maildir). For > > more complex setups (IMAP server, virtual mailboxes / domains), Just to clarify: We've deployed a solution involving all above a week ago and some months ago I've helped a 40k domains setup for a hosting company. > > SpamAssassin is still the only practical alternative. Moe mature - yes, maybe; more practical - I don't think so. > Actually your information is outdated. > It works very nice demonized as a content filter (LMTP/SMTP). -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" _______________________________________________ freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
