Well, because if it involves hacking it's obviously not as legitimate as
anything that a corporation would do. After all, hackers are malicious by
nature.

-Matt McDonald

On 2/23/07, Darren Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Jason C. Wells wrote:
> And on that topic, why does the MPAA go after the hacker instead of
> the company that sold them pure junk in the first place?

Because it would make entirely too much sense and as we all know, the
business world runs on dollars, not sense. ;)

--
Darren Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to