Jan Grant wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2007-03-25 01:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
FreeBSD's UFS2 already uses 96bit timestamps, where 64 bits are used
for seconds and 32 bits are used for nanoseconds. Is that sufficient
for you?
What the hell for?
``Just because it can.''
Good. :] 2x64bit for x64?
To measure what? Even at nanosecond resolution, the notion of
timestamping an event seems a little arbitrary. Much beyond it and it's
not clear exactly what you're "measuring" - or even if there is any
physical interpretation.
Yeah exactly, something's just redunant.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
