Sorry forget that last message.

GNOME was a bad example, but you did in essence you clarify my point. That
FreeBSD or whichever one you talk about may or may not be using a different
pkgsrc branch.

I didn't call any components standardized, i said even if you *were* to
standardize certain components for all BSDs (related to package management/
source) you still would have to get around the fact that each of them may
use a different pkgsrc branch.

Otherwise you wouldn't have the current differences in software
compatibility where FreeBSD has what (28000 packages?) and NetBSD has
(15000?)

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Martin <martin.kelly4...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I understand that, what your not getting is that i am talking about the
> release schedule of the individual BSD distros not the release schedule of
> pkgsrc.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:02 PM, John Marino <net...@marino.st> wrote:
>
>> On 12/4/2012 07:14, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
>>
>>> Martin<martin.kelly4000@gmail.**com <martin.kelly4...@gmail.com>>
>>>  writes:
>>>
>>>  I can see how you could misunderstand what i said.
>>>>
>>>> My point was about that each of the BSD's use pkgsrc in a different way
>>>> and
>>>> the releases from FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD or DflyBSD don't all rely on
>>>> the
>>>> exact same packages for every release (i.e. NetBSD 6 and FreeBSD 9 do
>>>> not
>>>> use the same version of GNOME-2 desktop; poor example), and that
>>>> generally
>>>> per BSD release they generally blob the binaries that are compatible for
>>>> that release together.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, pkgsrc is one for everyone, unless someone maintains his own branch.
>>> As far as I know, only DragonFly and SmartOS do, though nothing serious
>>> stops them from using original distribution. Thus NetBSD 6 and FreeBSD 9
>>> use
>>> the same version of GNOME, provided that they use supported pkgsrc
>>> branch.
>>>
>>
>>
>> DragonFly has a git mirror mirror of the pkgsrc cvs repository, but its
>> contents are identical to what is in cvs.  I would not classify this as
>> "maintaining its own branch".  We use the same distribution as NetBSD.
>>
>> Just clarifying this statement to avoid misinformation.
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to