> > This is an ACK. I like those names, the idea is okay given that > the documentation for it reflects what has been discussed here in > this thread so folks can understand this is a very simple security > measure. Hmm, dumb question for the day - where are things like "log_in_vain" documented. - And don't anyone say "in /etc/defaults/rc.conf"! If there is a manpage, I sure as hell haven't found it! Looks like I'm volunteering to write a manpage for the net.inet sysctls - or does one exist? - I sure as hell can't find it! > > And it works just like a blackhole route does... if no more specfic > route exists we send the packet to a bit bucket, now someone want > to make the routing code under ``port routes'' :-) :-)... That sounds rather like a plug gateway. :-) :-) A kernel level plug gateway would be quite a funky thing though. :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Geoff Rehmet
- Re: Dropping connections without RS... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Matt Crawford
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Leif Neland
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Ollivier Robert
- Re: Dropping connections without RS... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Warner Losh
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Garrett Wollman
- RE: Dropping connections without RST Geoff Rehmet
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Archie Cobbs
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Geoff Rehmet
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Rodney W. Grimes
- RE: Dropping connections without RST Geoff Rehmet
- Re: Dropping connections without RST John Polstra
- RE: Dropping connections without RST Geoff Rehmet
- Re: Dropping connections without RST Matt Crawford
- Teergrubes [was Re: Dropping connections without RST... Joel Ray Holveck
- RE: Dropping connections without RST Geoff Rehmet
- RE: Dropping connections without RST Peter Jeremy