On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 10:41:19PM +0000, Jason C. Wells wrote:
> Put me down as wanting two files. An extra file is just more shtuff to
> keep track of. I too am iffy on /etc/defaults. If the purpose of defaults
> is to keep "standard" things in isolation then lets do that. Begrudgingly,
> defaults do clean up /etc a bit. It makes mergemastering easier too. The
> defaults will be better when they become more complete.
The thing about the defaults/foo.conf, foo.conf, foo.conf.local scheme
is that you don't _have_ to use foo.conf.local if you don't want to.
Some of us have a use for it, such as putting site configuration in
foo.conf, and machine configuration in foo.conf.local.
--
Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netmonger.net
Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon -- http://www.freebsd.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
