So then what is -1 and why does it work when -100 doesn't? (I tried it)
-Charlie
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 09:13:41PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > I looked for some meaning to the -100, is this documented somewhere?
>
> It's not, yet. We should move to using some defines for this.
> A while back I proposed something like:
>
> #define DEVICE_MATCH_EXACT -100
> #define DEVICE_MATCH_CLASS -200
> #define DEVICE_MATCH_GENERIC -300
>
> The 'exact' response is still < 0 so that you can tune between two
> 'exact' drivers on a per-instance basis. The meanings should be pretty
> obvious...
>
> > Who calls it?
> >
> > -Charlie
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 11:30:46AM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
> > > On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:00:02 +0100 (MET),
> > > Thomas Schuerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > >
> > > >> --- sbc.c.orig Mon Dec 6 19:26:31 1999
> > > >> +++ sbc.c Tue Dec 7 22:15:25 1999
> > > >> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
> > > >> if (error)
> > > >> return error;
> > > >> else
> > > >> - return -100;
> > > >> + return -1;
> > > >> }
> > > >>
> > > >> static int
> > >
> > > Thomas> Works fine for me. Thanks!!!
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, this patch should work. The probe likelyhood(do we call it so?) for
> > > unknown device is -100, so it does not make sense for sbc to return
> > > -100.
> > >
> > > -1 might be too high, -50 sounds good to me.
--
Charles Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No quote, no nothin'
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
