It seems Richard Seaman Jr. wrote:
> >  
> > It already being tested, and it works, but at the same tike I found
> > out that the code in the old driver for the sis is schizofrenic, it
> > has one way of setting things up, and another way of reporting how
> > it is set :(, that way it is difficult to compare results from
> > the two drivers..
> 
> I think the old wd code was broken on reporting.  The reporting
> was changed from the original submission, when it was committed.

Yep, but it does mean that people _belive_ they are running UDMA
where in fact they aren't, and now they blaim the ata driver
for doing worse :(
I'm not sure the other values reported are valid either as they
are reported differently from what they are set to....

-Søren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to