At 12:17 AM +0100 1999/12/10, Brad Knowles wrote:
> In -CURRENT, I would say that this could probably be committed,
> if John feels safe. I am not yet convinced that it should be
> committed to -STABLE, although things do look good so far.
Well, things continue to look good:
Fri Dec 10 10:59:55 CET 1999
netstat -ran | wc -l
121
vmstat -m | grep routetbl | grep K
routetbl 246 34K 35K 40960K 275 0 0 16,32,64,128,256
uptime
10:59AM up 16:08, 0 users, load averages: 3.49, 3.83, 3.61
Fri Dec 10 11:00:56 CET 1999
netstat -ran | wc -l
120
vmstat -m | grep routetbl | grep K
routetbl 244 34K 35K 40960K 275 0 0 16,32,64,128,256
uptime
11:00AM up 16:09, 0 users, load averages: 3.41, 3.81, 3.62
Looking at our stats for yesterday on this machine, we came
pretty close to setting some new records for volume, and did quite a
lot of articles.
At this stage, given that this patch has fixed John's problems,
that the previous patch appears to have fixed Joe's problems, and
that I seem to be running fine after almost a day, I'd feel more
comfortable if John decides he wants to commit this patch to -STABLE.
When that happens, I'll cvsup & rebuild all the machines I can,
so that they can all get the benefit of this patch and the other
changes that have gone in recently.
Thanks!
--
These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy
____________________________________________________________________
|o| Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o|
|o| Systems Architect, News & FTP Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o|
|o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels |o|
|o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o|
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.
Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
