Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again)

[Peter Wemm]

Peter Wemm wrote:
> David Greenman wrote:
> >    I've heard from both of you that you think the other is wrong. This isn'
    t
> > very helpful, however, in finding the correct solution. What I'd like to he
    ar
> > from both of you is the reasons why swap is better as a device, or not. The
    re
> > seems to be some unstated architectural philosophy that needs to be stated
> > before any informed decision can be made about what is the right direction 
    to
> > go in.
> 
> The problem is that swapdev_vp needs to handle VOP_STRATEGY(), and swapdev_vp
> is incorrectly being pointed at spec_vnops.  Here is a proposed (UNTESTED!)
> clean fix:

This is missing a vop_default entry, so it will panic.  But as a proof of
concept it still stands.

Cheers,
-Peter




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message