Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

[Karl Denninger]

On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 01:31:25AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
> 
> >Yes, and my driftfile had that parameter in there.  Uhm, Poul, remember I've
> >been at this for just a LITTLE while.  Xntpd is something I had deployed
> >back in my *Sun* days (back when FreeBSD was, well, non-existent)
> 
> Karl, remember who was there too ? :-)
> 
> >> Anyway, ntpd4 is in CURRENT...
> >
> >Now it is.  
> >
> >And it works correctly too.
> 
> In general yes, but not if you use the hardpps() with a refclock,
> it works better after I fixed a couple of almost-mutually-canceling
> sign-bugs, but the parameters of the hardpps() PLL relative to the
> FLL are wrong.

You're still a bunch of revs back - the current is either "h" or "i", and it
has a bunch of fixes (including one here, I think)

> >Thanks anyway, even with the attitude.
> 
> Many happy returns :-)

Thy be welcome.

-- Karl


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message