On Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 06:49:25PM +0000, Doug Rabson wrote: > >On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Nicolas Souchu wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 11:13:09AM +0000, Doug Rabson wrote: >> > >> >On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Nicolas Souchu wrote: >> > >> >> Hi there, >> >> >> >> Currently, the ZIP+ probe is intrusive and sends char to the printer if >> >> no ZIP+ is connected. >> >> >> >> Here is a patch that corrects the problem for my printer, but I haven't >> >> any ZIP+ :) >> >> >> >> So, please check the ZIP+ is still detected. >> > >> >With this patch, I can *not* detect my ZIP+ (attached to a machine which >> >detects it using the existing code). >> >> Ok :( >> >> Does the last ppbus committed code (with IEEE1284 support) detects your >> ZIP+ at boot? Something like "IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE..." with >> its id 2 lines after? This may be another way to detect properly the ZIP+ > >Afraid not :-(. The ppb_1284_negociate fails with an error of >PPB_NOT_IEEE1284. I haven't tried using the PERIPH_1284 option which >seems to affect the negotiation - is it worth trying?
No. PERIPH_1284 should allow a computer to act as a IEEE1284 compliant peripheral when connected to another computer. > >P.S. The correct spelling is 'negotiate'. I keep wanting to do a >global-replace :-) Now, everybody on -current knows it :) I'm burned, as we say here. > >-- >Doug Rabson Mail: d...@nlsystems.com >Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 > > > -- nso...@teaser.fr / nso...@freebsd.org FreeBSD - Turning PCs into workstations - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
