On Wednesday, 20 January 1999 at 23:00:34 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: >> Sorry, Matt, the patch in my previous email was fatally flawed. Try this one >> below. The two printf() messages don't necessarily come out in pairs and >> it's not just NFS bufs' B_CACHE bits are cleared, so my comment about >> vm_page_is_valid() check in my previous message was wrong and the check is >> needed here. >> >> -lq > > Ok, I understand what you've done... you are effectively bypassing > having to check for B_DELWRI in bread(), breadn(), and nfs_bioread() > by forcing getblk() to handle the B_DELWRI condition. > > Cool. I'll replace my nfs_bioread() patch with this one and test it > before committing all this stuff to the -4.x branch ( which I will also > do sometime tonight ). > > I am also CCing this to current so Greg and Andreas are kept abrest > of events. I think this will fix *both* of their reported panics.
Not mine :-) Mine was a bug in vinum which I had already fixed; I was just concerned about whether it had shown its nose again. Greg -- See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger g...@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
