On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 11:02:48AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> Yes. I agree with that.
> if (a | b & c % d ^ e)
> should have been written as:
> if (((a | (b & (c % d))) ^ e) != 0)
I don't know why I'm getting into this, but to prove the point that this
expression takes careful thought, it is:
(a | ((b & (c % d)) ^ e))
(^ is higher precedence than | , according to /usr/share/misc/operator).
--
Zach Heilig <[email protected]> / Zach Heilig <[email protected]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
