John Birrell <j...@cimlogic.com.au> writes: > FWIW, this message is being edited with vi on a 2.2.8-STABLE machine > rlogged in from a dxterm running on an OSF/1 box. The keyboard is one > of DEC's LK401 things with the funny "Do" keys etc from back when VAX > was just a twinkle in PDP's eye. I have TERM=vt100 in my FreeBSD > environment, dxterm configured with the "Numeric Keypad" option checked > and vt100 emulation, so keypad keys are 0.123456789, just like you'd > expect. It's not vi that's the problem, just your termcap setting doesn't > match the keyboard.
But why is it only vi ? I see the same behaviour here (-current, Eterm, TERM=xterm). The numeric keypad works for XEmacs forced to use term instead of X, pico, mcedit (midnight commanders builtin editor), shell - everywhere else, but not for vi. -- # /AS/ http://privat.schlund.de/entropy/ # # According to rumours, MS finally decided to delay the release of the # # long-awaited Windows 2000 until the first quarter of 1901. -unknown # To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
