On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Feb 1999 11:54:01 PST, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > huh? can you expand on this... > > Um, sure. > > When my kernel build broke, I tried removing the option NFS_NOSERVER. > This allowed me to build a kernel. After the problem in nfs_syscalls.c > was repaired today (maybe last night), I put the option NFS_NOSERVER > back into my kernel config and rebuilt the kernel. > > I now have two files that make me think that including NFS_NOSERVER > dropped my kernel file size by 100KB: > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1385750 Feb 18 15:40 /kernel > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1494920 Feb 17 11:57 /kernel.old > > The box in question is used _only_ as an NFS client and the kind of > environmental change that would demand NFS server capabilities would > merit a reboot.
Interesting stats. Can you run size(1) on them too. I wonder how much of that is actual code. -- Doug Rabson Mail: d...@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
