> : Yeah, this doesn't comple for some reason as of about 1.0r4. The port just
> : doesn't bother trying to install it - no-one's cared enough to look at why
> : it's broken and how to fix it.
>
> It is broken because it assume too many implementation details about
> symbols being defined. A more accurate description would be that no
> one has cared enough to actually fix it. :-)
This seems to me to be a perfect use for netgraph: a socks based
interface in the kernel so that applications didn't need to be
brutalized to work with socks.
Hee hee hee...
Would this be a "transparent socksy"?
Terry Lambert
te...@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
