> Thus libg++ classes are a purely FSF class library that shouldn't be used > for any new code development. The current libg++ only contains what was > left after the ISO stdlibc++ stuff was gutted.
Thanks for the explanation - that makes things much clearer. So, I guess we shoot for libstdc++ as the "minimum requirements" and perhaps provide libg++ as well (not necessarily initially) just for the convenience of those porting code from environments where the GNU library functions were used. I've just built the world and kernel from egcs-2.91.62 and it seems to work pretty well. I haven't really stress the system all that much yet, but it hasn't misbehaved in any way yet. - Jrodan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
