On 07-Apr-99 Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > The problem is deeper. When I reemove it, I got this error: > > -2100 bytes available
tried with -O2 yet? > it seems that boot2 needs to be reduced, and I don't know why it becomes > that big and what can be reduced. First candidates are static cmd[512] > and kernel[1024]. Please fix so it can be still compiled with gcc. This raises an interesting point I think. Do we need to maintain gcc/egcs compatibility? Or do we, since we track CURRENT, say: "alas, that's progression for ye?" Has there been an `official' consensus reached about this from core or commiters? --- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <http://www.freebsdzine.org> asmodai(at)wxs.nl The idea does not replace the work... Network/Security Specialist <http://home.wxs.nl/~asmodai> *BSD: Powered by Knowledge & Know-how <http://www.freebsd.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
