Le Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:35:12 +0200, Bernd Walter <ti...@cicely7.cicely.de> a écrit :
> Go back to the originating mail. > Crypto code wasn't aware of this problem and this is a way more > obviuous optimization than function exchange. > And I do believe that the programmers were clever people. > Alarming, isn't it? The removal of dead store by gcc is recent. There was a discussion about this problem on the linux crypto mailing list, see: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org/msg04229.html If i remember well, they have introduced a secure_memset() function or something like that, but I do not find this piece of code any more. Regards. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
