On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > Hello. > Just for my couriosity: I'm missing llvm-as, llvm-ld and other binutils > from LLVM and was wondering why they are contained in the port's llvm > collection but not in FreeBSD's source contribution. There's no use for these utilities in FreeBSD base system.
> I build FreeBSD 9 with CLANG. But as a missing llvm-as and llvm-ld (or > llvm-ar) would imply, the binaries are generated via binutils from > theGNU suite, aren't they? llvm-{as,ld,ar} are not replacements for those from binutils. llvm-* work on the llvm bitcode only and are of no use for normal object files. dim@ made a patch that adds those utilities if you really need them http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/2011-June/000216.html By default when you compile things with clang it uses its own assembler (ie. it goes directly from C -> .o) so typically only gnu ld is used in the compilation chain. roman _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"