On 07/06/11 23:49, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 7/6/11, Hartmann, O.<ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
On 07/06/11 21:36, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
<s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switching
back to the old SCHED_4BSD scheduler.
If you are using MPI in numerical codes, then you want
to use SCHED_4BSD. ?I've posted numerous times about ULE
and its very poor performance when using MPI.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2008-October/026375.html
[sarcasm]
It is rather funny to see that the post you point out has generated
exactly 0 meaningful follow-up then and as you mention later in this
thread, the issue still remains today :-)
[/sarcasm]
Apparently, you are privy to my private email exchanges
with jeffr.
I'm also not sure why you're being sarcastic here. The
issue was and AFAIK still is a problem for anyone using
FreeBSD in a HPC cluster. ULE simply performs worse than
4BSD.
Well, I know only very little people using FreeBSD within a HPC cluster
or even for scientific purposes, except myself and some people around here.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-September/thread.html#58537
The problem is not only related to desktop boxes, it involves servers
with "big" hardware as well.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
