On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 04:07:22PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote: > > Hi Luigi, > > > > Thanks for reply. That's great solution :) Will be integrated with pf or > is > > it? > > unfortunately i don't have the time to do it, but as said > in the thread it should not be terribly difficult. > The demo image has a modified click.... is there a diff for click itself..... > cheers > luigi > > > Thanks, > > Victor > > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:39:17PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote: > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > I'm trying tunning a FreeBSD 8.2 to high perfomance network with pf. > My > > > > server configuration is: > > > > > > > > Dell 1950 > > > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz (1995.03-MHz > > > K8-class > > > > CPU) > > > > 4 x CPU > > > > 2 NIC (<Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T) > > > > 1 NIC (em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.1.9>) > > > > > > > > I want to reach the high processing of packets per second and use pf > as > > > > synproxy and we still processor to handle others packets or flows. > > > > > > > > I know that em drivers has MULTI_QUEUE implementation that helps high > > > > performance for Intel drivers, but I couldn't see more information > about. > > > We > > > > can reached 500k pps, but no more traffic was processed by this > > > interface. > > > > > > > > I've already enabled net.isr.direct but with Intel Drivers does not > work > > > and > > > > the most processors are in System instead of Interrupts, why? When I > > > enable > > > > net.isr.direct the processing is balanced for on CPU in system and > > > another > > > > in interrupt and I reached 1M pps, but the total perfomance is down, > the > > > > load grow up too fast. > > > > > > > > I've changed some parameter in sysctl for intel drivers, but it > doesn't > > > have > > > > effect. > > > > > > > > Someone know what I can do to reach more packets performance? I want > to > > > use > > > > this FreeBSD as a router/firewall only. > > > > > > if you feel like doing a bit of coding yourself, you could try netmap > > > > > > http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/ > > > > > > cheers > > > luigi > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Victor > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > > freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"