On Sep 2, 2011 7:59 AM, "Nathan Whitehorn" <nwhiteh...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 09/01/11 17:23, Matt Thyer wrote: >> >> On Sep 2, 2011 5:25 AM, "Warren Block"<wbl...@wonkity.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> >>>> On Sep 1, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Matt Thyer wrote: >>>> >>>>> Shouldn't we use MBR partitioning instead of GPT for the memstick image >> >> ? >> >>> It seems wrong to have gptboot just ignore backup GPT data, but it could >> >> be an option. Can it actually do something if the backup GPT differs, or is >> it testing for an error that can't be handled? >>> >>> >>> MBR didn't have backup data ("Luxury! Pure luxury!"), and it did okay. >> >> >> A custom hacked gptboot just for the memstick? >> >> Sorry.... Been working with Linux too much lately. >> >> Probably the real solution is to use MBR and have BSDinstall and the install >> kernel support UFS labels. Space on the memstick is not an issue. > > > Both support that. The issue is makefs(8). > -Nathan
During production of the memstick image? So don't use makefs then. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"