On Sep 2, 2011 7:59 AM, "Nathan Whitehorn" <nwhiteh...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> On 09/01/11 17:23, Matt Thyer wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 2, 2011 5:25 AM, "Warren Block"<wbl...@wonkity.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sep 1, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Matt Thyer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Shouldn't we use MBR partitioning instead of GPT for the memstick
image
>>
>> ?
>>
>>> It seems wrong to have gptboot just ignore backup GPT data, but it could
>>
>> be an option. Can it actually do something if the backup GPT differs, or
is
>> it testing for an error that can't be handled?
>>>
>>>
>>> MBR didn't have backup data ("Luxury! Pure luxury!"), and it did okay.
>>
>>
>> A custom hacked gptboot just for the memstick?
>>
>> Sorry.... Been working with Linux too much lately.
>>
>> Probably the real solution is to use MBR and have BSDinstall and the
install
>> kernel support UFS labels. Space on the memstick is not an issue.
>
>
> Both support that. The issue is makefs(8).
> -Nathan
During production of the memstick image?
So don't use makefs then.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
