On 9 September 2011 06:33, Oliver Lehmann <lehm...@ans-netz.de> wrote: > > Mike Tancsa <m...@sentex.net> wrote: > >> Just curious as to why you need cvsup and not instead use csup that is >> in the base ? > > I got used to it in the past 12 years? But this is not realy the question. > If it is "BROKEN" it should be marked as BROKEN or there should be a > statement that it will not work with FreeBSD 9 on at least amd64 or we > will have other users complaining about the same at least when > 9.0 RELEASE is out - right?
The cvsup port is normally used now only for cvsupd, for which there is no csupd analog. As far as I know, and perhaps mux (CC'd) could confirm every feature present in cvsup is present in csup-- and it's a fair amount faster too. Of course, cvsup could probably do with fixing, but for now csup is literally a drop-in replacement; it'll read all your supfiles too. Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
