> Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
> 0x08048b24 in do_typedef (s=0x80532bf "CUMULATIVE_ARGS", pos=0x805e1a4)
> at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/gengtype.c:103
> 103 {
>
> (gdb) disas 0x08048b24
> Dump of assembler code for function do_typedef:
> 0x08048b10 <do_typedef+0>: push %ebp
> 0x08048b11 <do_typedef+1>: mov %esp,%ebp
> 0x08048b13 <do_typedef+3>: push %ebx
> 0x08048b14 <do_typedef+4>: push %edi
> 0x08048b15 <do_typedef+5>: push %esi
> 0x08048b16 <do_typedef+6>: sub $0xc,%esp
> 0x08048b19 <do_typedef+9>: mov $0x805e1d4,%edi
> 0x08048b1e <do_typedef+14>: mov 0x10(%ebp),%esi
> 0x08048b21 <do_typedef+17>: mov 0x8(%ebp),%ebx
> 0x08048b24 <do_typedef+20>: nopw %cs:0x0(%eax,%eax,1)
LLVM attempts to use an optimal nop sequence when writing N-byte nop,
by using these nop instructions
static const uint8_t Nops[10][10] = {
// nop
{0x90},
// xchg %ax,%ax
{0x66, 0x90},
// nopl (%[re]ax)
{0x0f, 0x1f, 0x00},
// nopl 0(%[re]ax)
{0x0f, 0x1f, 0x40, 0x00},
// nopl 0(%[re]ax,%[re]ax,1)
{0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00},
// nopw 0(%[re]ax,%[re]ax,1)
{0x66, 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00},
// nopl 0L(%[re]ax)
{0x0f, 0x1f, 0x80, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00},
// nopl 0L(%[re]ax,%[re]ax,1)
{0x0f, 0x1f, 0x84, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00},
// nopw 0L(%[re]ax,%[re]ax,1)
{0x66, 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x84, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00},
// nopw %cs:0L(%[re]ax,%[re]ax,1)
{0x66, 0x2e, 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x84, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00},
};
There's no checking for a supported CPU, is it so that AMD geode doesnt support
any of these?
Any other cpu that doesnt support these? If this is CPU dependant, I suggest to
open a bug
report upstream as it's a bug.
roman
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
