On Nov 4, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Archy Cho wrote: > Hello > > I am very happy to see freebsd could have such network performance with > netmap , > since I am currently using freebsd as core routers instead of cisco. > > I tried to re-compile the freebsd 8.2 kernel to test , > however , I could not complete the task ( both i386 and amd64 ), > I could only success at 9.0-RC-1. > > Here is my task and error message, > > cp /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/Netmap-Router > echo "device netmap" >> /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/Netmap-Router > cd /tmp/netmap/sys/ > cp -R * /usr/src/sys/ > cd /usr/src/ > patch -p < /tmp/netmap/head-netmap.diff > echo "WITHOUT_MODULES = bge re igb" >> /etc/make.conf > make buildkernel KERNCONF=Netmap-Router > make installkernel KERNCONF=Netmap-Router > > -Werror ../../../dev/e1000/if_em.c -I../../../dev/e1000 > ../../../dev/e1000/if_em.c: In function 'em_setup_receive_ring': > ../../../dev/e1000/if_em.c:4012: error: 'j' undeclared (first use in this > function) > ../../../dev/e1000/if_em.c:4012: error: (Each undeclared identifier is > reported only once > ../../../dev/e1000/if_em.c:4012: error: for each function it appears in.) > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/Netmap-Router > > > Any hint of error message ? >
It's fairly easy to remove the offending code, AFAIK there were a few unused variable and signed vs unsigned comparisons. > More questions , > I seldom facing DDOS , whatever using polling or not , > 1Gbps link with 64bytes packet will cause CPU 100% , > if a freebsd box compile with netmap , > could it have performance boost of routed / ipfw / pf ? Not yet. In order to do that, ipfw or pf need to be ported to userspace. I believe that was on Luigi's agenda, though. -- Good, fast & cheap: pick any two. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"