Peter Maloney wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:41 PM, deeptech71 at gmail.com
> <deeptech71 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > X11R6 should be a symlink to local or ./local.
>
> Did you test this, by removing the link and creating it
> relative to see if there are any stupid side effects?
No apparent side effects. And I can't even see why there would be any.
In both cases (X11R6 points to "/usr/local" vs X11R6 points to "local")
- "/usr/X11R6" resolves to the symlink, although
different symlink texts can be extracted;
- "/usr/X11R6/" resolves to the "local" directory in "/usr";
- "/usr/X11R6/file123" resolves to "/usr/local/file123".
TODO: Test whether purely removing X11R6 has any side effects.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
