Hello.
On 03/20/2012 10:24, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message<20120319215802.gc1...@azathoth.lan>, Baptiste Daroussin writes:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35:08PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
here is the identification I propose:
arch-class-os-majorversion(-archi_specific_extension)
Given how sparse this name-space is, you'll have less than 50
different values, you might want to consider something more compact,
such as a single letter for all components, and the version number last:
X2F9 = x64-32-freebsd-9
X4F10 = x64-64-freebsd-10
A2FB9 = arm-32-freebsd-eb_oabi-9
By the time we run out of ASCII or even Unicode characters, we have
other problems.
And what is a purpose of making non-human-friendly platform identifiers?
I think, you'll gain nothing by this, but will create an unnecessary
complication.
--
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
system administrator of Computer Center of Southern Federal University
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
