On Apr 20, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-04-20 21:54, Jason Evans wrote: >> On Apr 20, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > ... >>> I think the best solution would be for jemalloc to avoid using obvious >>> names like "chunksize" for its globals, because it is basically a >>> library that could be linked to any sort of program out there. >>> >>> For example, it could prefix all its internal-use only globals with >>> "jemalloc_" or some other mangling scheme. Jason, any thoughts? >> >> jemalloc has optional namespace mangling support built in for just this >> reason. I'll turn it on, hopefully today. > > Indeed, I had just found jemalloc/internal/private_namespace.h. :) It > does seem to list only functions, not variables, is that right?
Ah right, functions only. Well then, I don't have any bright ideas for solving this problem in the short run. Jason_______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
