Am 11/03/12 15:17, schrieb Mark Felder: > On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 21:18:55 +0800 > Alie Tan <a...@affle.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> No offence, just curious about scheduler and its functionality. >> >> What is the different between this two that makes FreeBSD performance far >> behind DragonFly BSD? http://www.dragonflybsd.org/release32/ >> > > I don't have any details but I do know that Dragonfly has been putting a lot > of work into their scheduler. Hopefully some of that will trickle back our > way.
Obviously they made the right decissions, but a single benchmark with a DB server like postgresql doesn't tell the whole story. Let's see what Phoronix will come up with. I'd like to see some more benchmarks of DragonFly 3.2. I doubt that the DragonFly scheduler approaches will go/flow easily into FreeBSD. But I'd like to see it, even dumping ULE for a better approach.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
