Quick glance to nanobsd give me impression that:
1) nanobsd is MBR based, so :
2) nanobsd is disk-name-change sensitive.
GPT way is better - I'm using r${REV} as label, and root can be mounted no
matter how many other "firmware's" present, or how disks are ordered.
BTW, due to bug 173309 I had to rebuild and update my server, which took
only few minutes for reboot.
Well, nanobsd is great thing, I'll look into it a bit more, but it's goal
to have minified FreeBSD, while I need read-only one.
--
Regards,
Alexander Yerenkow
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
