On 11/20/12 11:43, Olivier Smedts wrote: > 2012/11/20 Paul Webster <paul.g.webs...@googlemail.com>: >> I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I >> believe the final decision was that to many users are used to the old >> style pf and an upgrade to the new syntax would cause to much confusion. > > But a change like this is expected in a new major branch, ie. > 10-CURRENT. Not so in -STABLE branches of course. I don't see the > problem here. > > Cheers >
What would be the alternative? Being stuck with the old PF? As Olivier Smedts said, changes like that are expected in a complete new branch. If people need to stay compatible, they are about to use 9.X as long as they have migrated. The downside is more work. The bright side would be development/progression. oh
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
