I don't know, in some ways it might be more interesting to make something just for a virtualized device, however reality is that I have way too many higher priority items to worry about after the new year gets underway than that, even so, we can see...
Jack On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Jack Vogel <jfvo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> LOL, it's ironic, my intention in creating lem was to isolate the old >> pre-PCIE driver from active changes so as to assure it's stability... >> but virtualization comes around to bit me in the butt :) >> >> I guess I'm agreeable in principle with what you're doing Luigi, but >> can you do me a favor and hold off until I'm technically back from >> vacation (after the new year) and let me review the code then? >> >> > sure, no rush -- i just wanted to have it out for review as it has been > ready for a few weeks now. > > Regarding lem vs em i actually wonder if it wouldn't be better to > consolidate the two drivers given the amount of common code. > While i understand the desire for stability, i actually wonder if there > is much if any leftover hw which uses 'lem' ... outside virtualization! > > cheers > luigi > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
