On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:23:34PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > Thank you for digging more. > > In fact, it is more likely that there is some bug or incompatibility in > c++ unwinder than in the libgcc itself, but as you noted, a compiler bug > is also possible. > > Anyway, I was mostly looking could the backtrace starts in rtld. Rtld bug > also cannot be excluded at this stage, but it not much likely.
FWIW, the diff between working and non-working assembler can be found at http://people.freebsd.org/~stefanf/tmp/libgcc_s.s.diff . Not that I expect much from that. Stefan _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
