On Sunday April 14 2013 19:30:22 wishmaster wrote: > > Do we honestly need three packet filters? > Yes! This is the most clever thought in this thread. Why we need 3 > firewalls? Two packet filters it's excess too. We have two packet filters: > one with excellent syntax and functionality but with outdated bandwidth > control mechanism (aka ALTQ); another - with nice traffic > shaper/prioritization (dummynet)/classification (diffused) but with > complicated implementation in not trivial tasks. May be the next step > will be discussion about one packet filter in the system?..
... and as far as I can tell none of them is currently usable on an IPv6-only FreeBSD (like protecting a host with sshguard), none of them supports stateful NAT64, nor IPv6 prefix translation :( Mark _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
