Hi Sean;
El 27/08/2013 5:58 p. m., Sean Bruno escribió:
Colin generated a patch for xen things that does some pretty typical
behavior. bsdpatch really didn't handle it well and rejected some
things and flat out refused to create sys/modules/xenhvm/Makefile for
me.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/2013-August/001697.html
When applying this patch with gnupatch I get:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/gnupatch.txt
When applying this patch with bsdpatch I get:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/bsdpatch.txt
I note that you are using GNU patch from the ports tree.
It would appear that both utilities reject the patches for:
sys/amd64/conf/XENHVM
sys/i386/conf/XENHVM
bsdpatch is uglily more verbose and handles the rejected patches much
less gracefully but it seems like gpatch also has issues with the same
patches.
I am not sure we can call this a regression: please note that bsd patch
is meant to replace the ancient GNU patch that we had in the tree (it's
still there under the name "gnupatch"). We ran an exp-run on ports and
there was only a small regression related to the patch level which is a
little stricter in BSD patch.
Any ideas here?
Not very helpful but I suggest using "svn patch" when possible. :(
Pedro.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
