In message <caj-vmomc6cmuo__etm7x6w8hpg8mafl2stepdsz4jn0xn6m...@mail.gmail.com>
, Adrian Chadd writes:

>> The compiler authors take the undefined part there as a blanket to perform
>> optimizations which are assuming that signed overflow cannot happen.

That's sufficient explanation for me to support your proposal.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to