On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Gleb Kurtsou <gleb.kurt...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On (07/10/2013 21:59), Outback Dingo wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Gleb Kurtsou <gleb.kurt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM, John-Mark Gurney <j...@funkthat.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > But will the work get done to clean it up after the freeze is over? > What > > > > happens if it doesn't, will it get removed before 10.1 or will we > have > > > > to live w/ the code? > > > > > > I still hope not to get hit by bus any time soon.. > > > > > > > on a side note, i applied the patch to stable/9 out of curiosity and the > > kernel failed to build the module > > however i could install fine from ports. > > Correct, there is no support for old kernels in the patch. > Port will be maintained and will provide support for older versions in > case PEFS finds its way to 10.0. Hi, Are there any news about PEFS commit ? Regards, _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"