On 27/07/2014 4:43 AM, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <53d395e4.1070...@fastmail.net>, Darren Reed writes: >> On 24/07/2014 1:42 AM, Cy Schubert wrote: >>>>> But, lack of ipv6 fragment processing still causes ongoing pain. That'= >>>>> s our=20 >>>>> #1 wish list item for the cluster. >>> Taking this discussion slightly sideways but touching on this thread a >>> little, each of our packet filters will need nat66 support too. Pf doesn't >>> support it for sure. I've been told that ipfw may and I suspect ipfilter >>> doesn't as it was on Darren's todo list from 2009. >> ipfiler 5 handles fragments for ipv6. > Switching gears and leaving the discussion of ipv6 fragments to mention > nat66. A lot of people have been talking about nat66. I could be wrong but > I don't think it can handle nat66. I need to do some testing to verify > this. I remember reading on sourceforge that it was on your todo list. It > doesn't look like it was checked off as being completed.
IPFilter 5 does IPv6 NAT. With the import of 5.1.2, map, rdr and rewrite rules will all work with IPv6 addresses. NAT66 is a specific implementation of IPv6 NAT behaviour. Cheers, Darren _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
